The personal blog of the author of the "Curious" books-- Curious Researcher, Curious Writer, and Curious Reader-- texts used in first-year college composition classes across the U.S. All the books emphasize inquiry-based learning. His latest book is Crafting Truth: Short Studies in Creative Nonfiction.
Monday, October 10, 2011
Teaching Abstraction
One of the most useful metaphors I've encountered about helping students understand the difference between what happened and what happens--a distinction that James Moffett suggests reflects two different levels of abstraction--is the 1980s television program "The Wonder Years." This program, about an 8th grader named Kevin growing up in suburban California during the turbulent sixties, uses a narrative technique that is now fairly commonplace on TV: the superimposition of two stories, one that captures what happened to Kevin as he experienced it, and the other a narrator who is the voice of the adult Kevin, reflecting on what happened. Each of these represent the two modes of abstraction--what happened and what happens--and it's clear that without the latter, the program wouldn't be nearly as poignant. We hear the adult narrator--or the "now narrator"--throughout the program, not just at the end, reinforcing the idea that such reflection isn't reserved for some final eureka paragraph. To show a clip to your students go on YouTube. Then talk about how it models a good personal essay, and a method of thinking that applies to everything they write.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment